Drawing for OKTAGON

USPTO serial 79123958

OKTAGON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OKTAGON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental, dento-surgical and oral surgical implants (artificial materials), including components and appliances, included in this class, artificial teeth, crowns, bridges; dental, dento-surgical and oral surgical apparatus and instruments to be used in connection with the above-mentioned goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 21, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 17, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 4, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 4, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 3, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 2, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance