Drawing for EYESTEP

USPTO serial 79124055

EYESTEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4430613Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 12, 2013
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYESTEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Paskar

Mark A. Paskar Bryan Cave LLP211 North Broadway, Suite 3600Saint Louis, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and operating software; computer games software; computer graphics software; computer software for creating and displaying video images that are physically interactive; interactive multimedia computer games programs; computer screens; LCD large-screen displays; video screens; flat panel display screens; flat panel electroluminescent display screens; computer peripheral equipmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Graphic design services; computer-aided graphic design; new product design services; computer hardware and software design and development; computer software design, development and programming services; consultancy in the field of software design and development; computer programming services relating to multimedia and interactive applicationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 22, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 21, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 22, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 12, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 12, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 27, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2013DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 1, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 1, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance