USPTO serial 79124061
.JLC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with .JLC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme
DYAN FINGUERRA-DUCHARME PRYOR CASHMAN LLP7 TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036-6569UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of luxury goods provided via the Internet and other computer and electronic communication networks; input, administrative management and research, namely, analysis, evaluation, creation and brand establishment of domain names of computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of messages; routing of Internet requests from end users to providers of hosting for Internet sites; provision of access to on-line computer databases relating to data concerning domain name registrations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Internet Protocol (IP) address verification aimed at enabling or refusing access to data and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network, including domain names featuring the TLD that appears in the mark in the field of luxury goods and also including coordination of registering domain names for identification of users and Internet Protocol addresses on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richemont International SA
- Other trademarks owned by RICHEMONT INTERNATIONAL SA
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named .JLC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |