USPTO serial 79124063
.PIAGET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with .PIAGET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of luxury goods provided via the Internet and other computer and electronic communication networks; input, administrative management and research, namely, analysis, evaluation, creation and brand establishment of domain names of computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of messages; routing of Internet requests from end users to providers of hosting for Internet sites; provision of access to on-line computer databases relating to data concerning domain name registrations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Internet Protocol (IP) address verification aimed at enabling or refusing access to data and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network, including domain names featuring the TLD that appears in the mark in the field of luxury goods, namely, cuff links, tie clips, rings, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, brooches, key rings made of precious metals, watches, chronometers, timepieces, clocks and horological instruments, and also including coordination of registering domain names for identification of users and Internet Protocol addresses on the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richemont International SA
- Other trademarks owned by RICHEMONT INTERNATIONAL SA
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named .PIAGET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |