USPTO serial 79124236
LUMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4457024Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 31, 2013
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LUMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neuhausen am Rheinfall, CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey J. Nein
Jeffrey J. Nein Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A.65 East State StreetSuite 1800Columbus, OH 43215Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat [ ; game; tinned meat; charcuterie ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Online retail store services featuring meat and charcuterie products via global computer networks; retail store services featuring meat and charcuterie products ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | [ Providing food and drink services for customers ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Luma Beef AG
- Other trademarks owned by Marco Tessaro
- Other trademarks owned by Marco Tessaro
- Other trademarks owned by Marco Tessaro
- Other trademarks owned by Lucas Oechslin
- Other trademarks owned by Lucas Oechslin
- Other trademarks owned by Lucas Oechslin
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named LUMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |