Drawing for XXL

USPTO serial 79124439

XXL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XXL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law299 South Main Street, Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
033Alcoholic beverages except beersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 15, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 3, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 8, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 20, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 22, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 2, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 20, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 20, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 20, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 26, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 26, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 26, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 8, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 1, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance