USPTO serial 79124679
NEWEDGE THE CRITICAL DIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEWEDGE THE CRITICAL DIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; distribution of prospectuses, of samples; arranging newspaper subscriptions (for others); business consultancy, information or inquiries; accounting; document reproduction; employment agencies; computerized file management; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; professional consulting, information or business inquiry services; publication of advertising texts; assistance provided to industrial or commercial companies pertaining to business operations; assistance services concerning company operations as well as commercial and advertising information services relating thereto; analysis and evaluation of company operation, market position and value; administrative services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Insurance underwriting; financial affairs; monetary affairs; banking; provident funds; issuance of travelers' checks and letters of credit; brokerage services with respect to financial markets and particularly futures markets, financial and stock market consulting services and financial and stock market information services; capital investment; clearing operations; monetary information; financial analyses, stock exchange brokerage, financial management, wealth management, fund investments, collective investment of securities, including those provided online or stored and forwarded from data-processing systems, from computer databases, computer, computer communication or telecommunication networks, including the global communication network, the World Wide Web and the network enabling the transfer of content and services from the global communication network and the World Wide Web to cellular telephones as well as to any other wireless terminal; management of portfolios comprising securities; services for financial interests in companies as well as financial consulting services relating thereto | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |