USPTO serial 79124708
DURAGRADEMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4483020Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2014
- Examiner
- CROMER, ZACHARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURAGRADEMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | [ Coatings in the nature of stainless steel to be applied over dental instruments ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Tips of metal for dental hand instruments, namely, Explorers, Probes, Scalers, Currettes, Trimmers, Packers, Carriers, Burnishers, Carvers, Excavators; tips of metal for ultrasonic devices for use in dental procedures; [ tips featuring coatings of metal as a component of dental instruments, namely, Explorers, Probes, Scalers, Currettes, Trimmers, Packers, Carriers, Burnishers, Carvers, Excavators; dental ultrasonic scalers; ] dental hand instruments, namely, Explorers, Probes, Scalers, Currettes, Trimmers, Packers, Carriers, Burnishers, Carvers, Excavators; dental ultrasonic instruments for scaling, excavation, endodontics, curetting and surgery in the field of dentistry | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LM-Instruments Oy
- Other trademarks owned by LM-Instruments Oy
- Other trademarks owned by LM-Instruments Oy
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named DURAGRADEMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | NC71 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 71 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |