Drawing for HIGH-TECH BRIDGE

USPTO serial 79124799

HIGH-TECH BRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4457042Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 31, 2013
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGH-TECH BRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Rental of computer software; creation and maintenance of websites for othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
045Security services for the protection of property and individuals, namely, security consultancy; detective agenciesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 27, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 26, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 26, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 31, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 16, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 30, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 31, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 31, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 23, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 29, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 9, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance