USPTO serial 79124883
BAIT SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAIT SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Jackson
David A. Jackson Klauber & Jackson LLC25 East Spring Valley Avenue, Suite 160Bergen FourMaywood, NJ 07607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Smoke detectors, smoke and fire alarms; sound transmitting apparatus and instruments for deterring vermin, including in buildings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Poison holders for dispensing poison to vermin including poison bait holders; holders for dispensing poison to vermin located in a ceiling, wall or floor of a building; holders for dispensing a spray including an insecticide spray; vermin traps including rat and insect traps; electronic and electrical apparatus for attracting, deterring and exterminating vermin including electronic and electrical apparatus for attracting, deterring and exterminating animals and insects in buildings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of buildings; installation, maintenance and repair of equipment in buildings including installation, maintenance and repair of electronic and electrical apparatus and installation, maintenance and repair of vermin exterminating apparatus, vermin traps and vermin poison dispensers in buildings; exterminating vermin included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |