USPTO serial 79124905
BEVERLY HILLS FORMULA DENTIST'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEVERLY HILLS FORMULA DENTIST'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toothpaste, mouthwash, dentifrices, cosmetics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |