Drawing for MIAPARIS

USPTO serial 79125243

MIAPARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAVEESHVAR, JUHI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIAPARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles; motors and engines for land vehicles; suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; bodies for vehicles; vehicle chassis or bumpers; electric vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Business managementSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Cleaning or maintenance of vehicles; vehicle breakdown assistance (repair)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 9, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 14, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 22, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 28, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance