Drawing for MULTICLAD

USPTO serial 79125257

MULTICLAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTICLAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl S. Scotney

Cheryl S. Scotney Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL1 East Fourth StreetSuite 1400Cincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys; cladding of metal for building; pipes and tubes of metal; casting, foils, powder, and rolled, drawn or extruded semi-finished articles of tin or its alloys; aluminum profiles; extruded semi-finished articles of common metals; brazed and bonded coils, strips and sheets, cladded and non-cladded of common metals; aluminum components for the engineering industry, namely, aluminum tubingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Heat exchangersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Materials treatment information; custom assembling of materials for others; treatment of metals; metal castingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 27, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 19, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 29, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance