USPTO serial 79125296
CUPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
47898 MONTEGIARDINO, SM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law299 South Main Street, Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather; bags, namely barrel bags, Boston bags, cabin bags, sacks in the nature of a soft handbag, clutch bags, garment bags, change purses; wallets; notecases; backpacks; rucksacks; all purpose sports bags; beach bags; carrying cases for documents; shopping bags with wheels attached; textile shopping bags; handbags; school satchel cases; suitcases; sports bags; tote bags; shoulder bags; carrier bags made of fabric, namely animal carrier bags, waist-bags, wheeled carrier bags, bum-bags; cosmetic bags sold empty; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas and parasols; walking sticks; leads for animals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing namely sweaters, cardigans, waistcoats, suits, trousers, shorts, jumpers, raincoats, stockings and socks, stocking suspenders, sock suspenders, wind resistant jackets, ski-trousers, fur coats, overcoats, skirts, dresses, jackets, undershirts, T-shirts, sport clothing, namely, sport jerseys and breeches for sports, sport over uniforms; blouses, shirt-collars, shirts, foulards, beachwear, swimsuits, bikini, tracksuits; wedding dresses; underwear, bras, brassiere, corsets, underpants, briefs, vests, nightgowns, negligees, pyjamas, gloves, shawls, scarves, neckties, bow ties, belts for clothing, suspenders, hats, caps; shoes, boots, half boots, leather shoes, galoshes, rain boots, sport footwear, sandals, slippers, shoe soles, shoe heels, footwear uppers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2014 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |