USPTO serial 79125336
ENTERPRISE ANALYTICS STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENTERPRISE ANALYTICS STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Lamb
Eric Lamb SMITHAMUNDSEN LLC201 N ILLINOIS ST S TOWER STE 1400INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the management, analysis and reporting of decision-making processes, project management, business and organisational management, enterprise management, knowledge management, business intelligence and collaborative learning and endeavour; computer software for use in applying concepts of social computing and smart personalisation by performing logical reasoning operations using rules expressing logical relationships between concepts and data, facilitating collaboration and actioning decision making within a framework defined by the software; computer software for monitoring, identification, collaboration, auto-classification, sorting, prioritisation, intelligent push and extraction of content and data from multiple, unrelated data sources to allow relational reasoning for use in decision-making processes, project management, business and organisational management, enterprise management, knowledge management and collaborative learning and endeavour; software for the inter-relationship of diverse factors, goals, objects and processes to be identified, modelled and analysed, qualitatively and quantitatively; blank electronic storage media | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |