Drawing for MÖLLER

USPTO serial 79125390

MÖLLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MÖLLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Lawnmowers machines; mortising machines; hoists and their parts and fittings; electric hammers; chain saws; hand-held electric drills (except electric coal drills); electrical grinding wheel engines; angle burnishing machines; pumps machines; high pressure washers; to-and-fro saws; band saws; aerating pumps for aquaria; dry cleaning machines; mixing machines; washing apparatus; spray-paint machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 30, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 23, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 26, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 26, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance