Drawing for UNIMATEC

USPTO serial 79125555

UNIMATEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4565890Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2014
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with UNIMATEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry; ammonium salts for use in industry; sodium salts for use in industry; surface-active chemical agents, namely, surface active compounds for general use in the industrial products, namely, as wetting, spreading, emulsifying, dispersing and penetrating agents; mold-release preparations; chemical agents, namely, chemical reagents for non-medical purposes, vulcanising preparations, or cross-linking agents for non-medical purposes; chemical reagents, other than for medical or veterinary purposes; vulcanising preparations; vulcanisation accelerators; chemical intensifiers for rubber, namely, cross-linking agents; chemical substances for analyses in industrial laboratories, other than for medical or veterinary purposes; iodine for industrial purposes; anti-reflection coating chemicals; fluorspar compounds; acrylic monomer in the nature of fluorine monomers; acrylic polymer in the nature of chemical preparations or agents for use in industry; adhesives not for stationery or household purposes; adhesives for industrial purposes; higher fatty acids for use in fluorspar compounds; unprocessed plastics; polymerization plastics; acrylic resins, unprocessed; fluorine resins; polyurethane resins; synthetic resins, unprocessedACTIVE—
017Plastic substances, semi-processed; rubber, raw or semi-worked; synthetic rubber; acrylic rubber; nitrile rubber; fluoro rubber; latex rubber for industrial use; liquid rubber; non-metal gaskets for machinery; pipe gaskets; sealant compounds for joints; joint packings for resin pipes, resin tubes, pipes of metal and tubes of metal; junctions for pipes, not of metal; packings as sealing devices; non-metal oil seals for use in machinery; non-metal o-rings for use in machineryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 2, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 27, 2020NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2020C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 27, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2020ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2015DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 6, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 15, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 28, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance