Drawing for AEROMAT

USPTO serial 79125803

AEROMAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AEROMAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Pipes (parts of sanitary installations); water-pipes for sanitary installations; pressure water tanks; pipe hoop for hot-water heating device; softening apparatus (water); wastewater treatment device; water purification installations; water conduits installations; three way pipe for hot-water heating device; pipe joint for hot-water heating deviceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 2, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 15, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 26, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 16, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 30, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 30, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 26, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 28, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 28, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 25, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 28, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 28, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance