Drawing for LOADMAP

USPTO serial 79125806

LOADMAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4409240Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 1, 2013
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LOADMAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Una L. Lauricia

Una L. Lauricia Eaton Corporation1000 Eaton BoulevardCleveland, OH 44122United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring computer programmes recorded for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring computer programmes recorded for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; pre-recorded optical data carriers featuring computer programmes recorded for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; pre-recorded optical data carriers featuring computer programmes recorded for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; pre-recorded solid state data carriers featuring computer programmes recorded for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; pre-recorded solid state data carriers featuring computer programmes recorded for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; data processing equipment; data processing equipment for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; data processing equipment for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; data acquisition equipment, namely, electrical energy utilization metering devices, electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software, sensors for the determination of temperatures, temperature sensors, cable temperature sensors, contact temperature sensors, ambient temperature sensors, temperature differential sensors; data acquisition equipment for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints, namely, electrical energy utilization metering devices, electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software, sensors for the determination of temperatures, temperature sensors, cable temperature sensors, contact temperature sensors, ambient temperature sensors, temperature differential sensors; data acquisition equipment for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint, namely, electrical energy utilization metering devices, electrical energy utilization metering devices complete with related software, sensors for the determination of temperatures, temperature sensors, cable temperature sensors, contact temperature sensors, ambient temperature sensors, temperature differential sensors; computers; computers for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; computers for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; computer hardware; computer hardware for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; computer hardware for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; computer peripherals; computer peripherals for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joint; computer peripherals for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; recorded computer programmes, namely, programmes for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; recorded computer programmes, namely, programmes for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; downloadable computer programs for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; downloadable computer programs for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; recorded computer software for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; recorded computer software for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical joint; downloadable computer software for use in relation to locating compromised electrical joints; downloadable computer software for use in relation to determining the maximum electrical load that can be applied to an electrical jointACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 16, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2024EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 19, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 21, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 3, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 31, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 1, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 16, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance