USPTO serial 79125884
THE DIFFERENCE IS CLEAR TRMSO TRMSO TRMSO TRMSO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DIFFERENCE IS CLEAR TRMSO TRMSO TRMSO TRMSO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy E. Miller
WENDY E MILLER Wissing Miller LLP434 West 33rd Street, 12th FloorThe Lofts at Manhattan WestNew York, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, processed and unprocessed krill, dried krill, krill meal, krill powder, krill extracts and krill oil sold as a component ingredient of pharmaceuticals in the nature of antioxidants, dietary supplements and nutraceuticals in the nature of dietary supplements; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, processed and unprocessed krill, dried krill, krill meal, krill powder and krill oil sold as a component ingredient of pharmaceuticals in the nature of antioxidants for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, namely, processed krill and dried krill, poultry and game; edible oils and fats, namely, krill meal, krill powder and krill oil | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2014 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |