USPTO serial 79125982
CHERRY LADY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHERRY LADY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (except beers) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |