USPTO serial 79126049
AKVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4438100Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 2013
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AKVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-1011 TG AMSTERDAM, NL
NL-1011 TG AMSTERDAM, NL
AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O. Box 230692New York, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | [ Mineral and aerated waters ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Fundraising for charitable purposes in the fields of agriculture, rural development, education, health, social security, environment, energy, industry, leisure, tourism, communications, publishing, infrastructure, transportation, logistics, housing, and real estate regional and urban development; charitable fundraising for development of information systems in the field of institutional development; information, advice and consultancy relating to finance and insurance as it relates to the fields of poverty reduction and social security | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Information, advisory and consultancy services in the fields environmental protection, energy efficiency engineering and urban development; information, advisory and consultancy services in the field of providing engineering and urban planning services for the reduction of poverty; information, advice and consultancy relating to the development of computer systems for the exchange and communication of information | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stichting Akvo
- Other trademarks owned by Stichting Akvo
- Other trademarks owned by Stichting Akvo
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AKVO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |