USPTO serial 79126163
PERMAGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4603614Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2014
- Examiner
- KELLY, AMY C
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with PERMAGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-06250 MOUGINS, FR
F-06250 MOUGINS, FR
F-06250 MOUGINS, FR
Miami, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Y. Silverstein
Aaron Y. Silverstein Saunders & Silverstein LLP14 Cedar Street, Suite 224AMESBURY, MA 01913-1831United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Varnishes, lacquer paints, preservatives coatings for metal and wood surfaces on land, sea and aeronautical vehicles; [ dyestuffs; ] clear and pigmented coatings in the nature of polymer fluids for metal and wood surfaces on land, sea and aeronautical vehicles; all of the foregoing excluding products with antimicrobial properties | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, and abrasive preparations; soaps; polymer fluids for polishing, shining and protecting vehicles exterior surfaces, namely, land, sea and aeronautical vehicles; preparations for cleaning, protecting and preserving vehicles interior and exterior surfaces, namely, land, sea and aeronautical vehicles; all of the foregoing exclusively for use on vehicle surfaces, namely, land, sea and aeronautical vehicles, and excluding products with antimicrobial properties | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Cleaning of building interiors, building exteriors and windows; cleaning and maintenance of vehicles; cleaning, polishing, waxing, and applying protective coatings to vehicles surfaces, namely, of land, sea and aeronautical vehicles; protecting and treating of building surfaces and wind turbines in the nature of applying protective coatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Burnishing by abrasion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEFEBVRE d'ARGENCE, Luc
- Other trademarks owned by LEFEBVRE d'ARGENCE, Luc
- Other trademarks owned by LEFEBVRE d'ARGENCE, Luc
- Other trademarks owned by LDA MIAMI LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PERMAGARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |