Drawing for AIRO

USPTO serial 79126339

AIRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4457092Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 31, 2013
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AIRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Alexander Nolte

N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for the cutting [ ; waterjet cutting machines; ultrasonic cutting machines; blade sharpening machines; milling cutters; punching machines; machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials; laser welding machines ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2025INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 10, 2025INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 14, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 13, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 5, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 15, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 12, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Nov 28, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 31, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 14, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 14, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance