Drawing for ONE CENT FLIGHTS

USPTO serial 79126563

ONE CENT FLIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE CENT FLIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retailing of travel goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039Provision of flight booking servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 12, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 14, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance