Drawing for CHRISTINA MUSE

USPTO serial 79126776

CHRISTINA MUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
I, DAVID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRISTINA MUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; cosmetic creams; cosmetic preparations for skin care; lotions for cosmetic purposes; beauty masksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 13, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 30, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance