Drawing for OCS OJMAR CODE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79127945

OCS OJMAR CODE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4412860Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 8, 2013
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCS OJMAR CODE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore

Elizabeth Lee D'Amore Lucas & Mercanti, LLP30 Broad Street, Floor 21NEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric and electronic locks; electronic controls for opening doors [ ; checking apparatus, namely, cameras; equipment for data processing; security systems, namely, building security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 18, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 20, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 19, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 10, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 8, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 26, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 30, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 30, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 23, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2019PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Aug 18, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 8, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 23, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 22, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 21, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance