Drawing for VENERE

USPTO serial 79127968

VENERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman P. Soloway

Norman P. Soloway Hayes Soloway, P.C.4640 E. Skyline DriveTucson, AZ 85718UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Black rice; black rice-based cakes; black rice-based snack food, black rice-based sauces, flour made in whole or substantial part of black rice, milled black rice, treated black riceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Animal feed, unprocessedSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
033Rice alcoholSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 12, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 4, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2014RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 14, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance