Drawing for MFJ

USPTO serial 79128061

MFJ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MFJ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture; chairs; tea tables; wickerwork; woven articles of bamboo, not including hats, mattings, mattresses; woven articles of rattan, not including shoes, hats, mattings, mattresses; woven articles of palm fiber, including boxes, not including mattings, mattresses; woven articles of straw, not including shoes, hats, mattings, mattresses; shopping baskets of wicker; artware of bamboo and woodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 8, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 17, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance