Drawing for CHIPSLETTEN

USPTO serial 79128198

CHIPSLETTEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4549660Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 17, 2014
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIPSLETTEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Striker

Michael J. Striker COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Potato chips, potato sticks; processed potatoes; raisins, dried, roasted, salted and/or spiced hazelnuts, peanuts, pistachio nuts, cashew nuts and almonds; dried fruitSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Pastry and biscuits, cakes, chocolate, praline sweets, sweetmeats, candies, marzipan; puffed corn snacks; extruded snacks of wheat, rice or cornSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 5, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 17, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 27, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 1, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 12, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jan 30, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2013FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 29, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 28, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 24, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance