Drawing for ISEM

USPTO serial 79128206

ISEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie B. Seyler

JULIE B. SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10174UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the field of fashion, creation, business, marketing, communication and management; fashion, creation, business, marketing, communication and management training; entertainment in the nature of fashion shows; organizing sporting events and cultural events; publication of books, of magazines; lending libraries; videotape film production; organization of educational or entertainment fashion competitions; organization and conducting of colloquiums, conferences or congresses in the field of fashion, creation, business marketing, communication and management; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; publication of electronic books and journals on-line; electronic desktop publishingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 31, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 30, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 30, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2013RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance