Drawing for HAIR COUTURE

USPTO serial 79129091

HAIR COUTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAIR COUTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Morgan

Jeffrey Morgan Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg1000 Louisiana Street, 53rd FloorHouston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026False hair; hair extensions; hair ornaments, not of precious metal; hair pins, not of precious metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 3, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 5, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 16, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 23, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance