Drawing for THE CORNWALL COLLECTION

USPTO serial 79129202

THE CORNWALL COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CORNWALL COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric T. Fingerhut

Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1300 I Street, N.W.Suite 300 WestWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, excluding bar stool and workshop stoolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Wholesale store services, retail store services and import and export agencies all in the field of furnitureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 24, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 15, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 15, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance