Drawing for SUPERFARMER

USPTO serial 79129207

SUPERFARMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4553788Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2014
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERFARMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark M. Friedman

Mark M. Friedman Dr. Mark Friedman Ltd.7 Jabotinsky St.Moshe Aviv Tower, 54th FloorRAMAT GAN, 5252007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, namely, board games; board gamesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 5, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 9, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 2, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 9, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 24, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 6, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 5, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 9, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance