USPTO serial 79129219
ALTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Morgan
Jeffrey Morgan Novak Druce Connolly Bove + Quigg1000 Louisiana Street, 53rd FloorHouston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical goods, namely, optical reflectors, optical lenses; actinometers; electrical terminal blocks; electric light dimmers regulators; ballasts for fluorescent lamps; connections for electric lines; voltage stabilizing power supply; power switches; electric apparatus for commutation, namely, current rectifiers; illumination regulators; lighting ballasts; battery charge devices; electrical controllers; electrical controlling devices; remote control apparatus, namely, remote control switches for lighting equipment; computer software for lighting control; data processing apparatus; microprocessors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Lamps, not electric; globes for lamps; lamp reflectors; lamp glasses; lighting apparatus and devices, namely, headlights for automobiles; lighting apparatus and devices, namely, lamps for bicycles; street lamps; dynamo lamps; implements for discharge lamps, namely, transformers, condensers, voltage stabilizers; miniature light bulbs; lighting devices for showcases; spotlights; lamps for outdoor use; projector lamps; decoration lamps; electric lamps; electric lighting apparatus, namely, downlights, track lights, pendant lights, explosion-proof lamps; electric torches for lighting; ceiling lights; desk lamps; floodlights | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Wholesale services featuring electric lighting apparatus fixtures; retail services featuring electric lighting apparatus fixtures; wholesale store services featuring electric lighting apparatus fixtures via the internet; retail services featuring electric lighting apparatus fixtures via the internet; lighting apparatus fixtures procurement services for others purchasing lighting apparatus for other businesses; commercial information agencies for the sale of electric lighting apparatus fixtures; import-export agencies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 20, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |