Drawing for SELVAS

USPTO serial 79129867

SELVAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SELVAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of game softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2025Further Decision Processed by IB—
Feb 24, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 17, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 16, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 13, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 13, 2016FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 28, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 23, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance