Drawing for KALI

USPTO serial 79130220

KALI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4561797Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 8, 2014
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Potassium salts, in particular potassium chloride, potassium sulphate; magnesium salts, in particular magnesium chloride and magnesium hydroxide, kieserite, magnesium sulphate; magnesium oxide; sodium salts, in particular rock salt, sodium chloride, all the aforesaid goods being chemical preparations for industrial purposes; mineral fertilizing preparations, in particular potassium fertilizing salt also derived from recycling products, potassium fertilizing salt containing straight or compound fertilizer, organic fertilizer, and also from recycling products, as compost, pulp and liquid manure; mixture of mineral and organic fertilizer as aforesaidSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 19, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 6, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 8, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2014UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2014FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 14, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 30, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance