Drawing for HAVIT

USPTO serial 79130552

HAVIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAVIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer keyboards; electronic data processing apparatus; electronic card readers; USB hubs; computer peripheral devices; notebook computers; computer mouse; cabinets for loudspeakers; microphones; earphonesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 11, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 10, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance