Drawing for KEEEB

USPTO serial 79130665

KEEEB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4449615Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 17, 2013
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEEEB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore R. Remaklus

Theodore R. Remaklus Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P.600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for database and information knowledge management in the field of storage and organization of websites and their content; the aforesaid goods excluding software for mobile telephones, tablet computers, TV systems and car entertainment systems for communication and interaction, including in real time with other users via the Internet and via mobile networks, including mobile networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software for database and information knowledge management in the field of storage and organization of websites and their content; the aforesaid services excluding the design and development of computer hardware and software for mobile phones, tablet computers, TV systems and in-car entertainment systems to communicate and interact, in real time with other users via the Internet and via mobile networks, such as mobile networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2023DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 17, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 27, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2016COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 14, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 20, 2015ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 29, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 13, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 17, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2014CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Feb 20, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2014AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Feb 4, 2014ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2014CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 4, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 17, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 18, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 17, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance