USPTO serial 79130716
LOWTEMP DEBOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOWTEMP DEBOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy L. Emhoff
Stacy L. Emhoff Walker & Jocke231 South BroadwayMedina, OH 44256UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and apparatus for producing, aligning, adjusting, bonding, coating, laminating, developing, cleaning, printing, irradiating, thermal treatment and lithographic treatment, namely, nanostructure-imprinting machines, hot embossing machines, micro-contact printing machines, and packaging machines for electronic circuitry or semi-conductors; parts and equipment, namely, fittings, bearings, chucks, joints and lubricating apparatus for the aforesaid machines and apparatus, included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Computer software for use in processing equipment for processing of electronic circuitry or semi-conductors, in particular of transistors or wafers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical consultancy, for others, in relation to methods and devices in the field of semiconductor technology, namely, research and design in the area of semiconductor systems, semiconductor cell libraries, wafers and integrated circuits, semiconductor packages, semiconductor testing devices, semiconductor handling and storage devices and semiconductor processing technology; research and development, for others, in relation to methods and devices in the field of semiconductor technology; technical system engineering, for others, in relation to methods and devices in the field of semiconductor technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |