Drawing for POWERNAP

USPTO serial 79131419

POWERNAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERNAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

Michael B. Lasky Altera Law Group120 South Sixth Street, Suite 1700Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for the recording, transmission and reproduction of sound, including speakers, microphones, telephones as well as parts and accessories, namely speakerphones and headphones for automobiles; headsets for telephones; corded and wireless headphones and headsets for computers, telephones, and mobile telephones; hands-free communication apparatus and equipment, namely, headphones and speakerphones for call centers, offices and personal computers; hands-free communication apparatus and equipment, namely, headphones and ear phones for mobile telephones; hands-free telephones and equipment interface solutions, namely, electronic display interfaces and graphical user interface software, hands-free communication apparatus for the reproduction of speech and music from mobile telephones and from computers both corded and wireless; parts for headsets and wireless controls for computers; recorded computer programs for wireless telecommunications devices, computer and video game softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 24, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 23, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 23, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 21, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 28, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance