Drawing for IBULB

USPTO serial 79131615

IBULB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IBULB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lamps; incandescent burners; light-emitting diodes LED lighting apparatus; sockets for electric lights; lighting apparatus and installations; street lamps; cooling appliances and installations; air conditioning apparatus; bath fittings; lights for automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2024UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 26, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 25, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 6, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 2, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance