Drawing for WEIMA

USPTO serial 79131726

WEIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machines; mowing and reaping machines; motorized cultivators; railroad construction machines; internal combustion engines, not including those for automobiles, tractors, combined corn harvesters, motor vans, chain saws or steam engines; diesel engines, other than for land vehicles; gasoline engines, other than for land vehicles; dynamos; pumps, namely machines; welding machines, electricSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 30, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance