Drawing for AUDIOPASS

USPTO serial 79131808

AUDIOPASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOPASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer operating programs, recorded; computer peripheral devices; data processing apparatus; computer software recorded; couplers data processing equipment; computer interfaces; readers data processing equipment; integrated circuit cards smart cards; smart cards integrated circuit cards; electronic publications downloadableSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 11, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 16, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 10, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance