USPTO serial 79132444
QUANTUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUANTUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated abrasives tools, namely grinding wheels, cut-off grinding wheels, flap discs, attachments configured to power-operated tools, namely, grinding wheel, segments mounted and mounted points and cones; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Abrasive grinding tools in the nature of manually-operated grinding wheels, flap discs and wheels; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 9, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |