Drawing for VISTECH

USPTO serial 79132702

VISTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheldon H. Klein

Sheldon H. Klein Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.600 New Hampshire Ave., NWSuite 700Washington, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear, headgear; including clothing with reflective or fluorescent elements or materials, light reflective clothingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Games and toys; gymnastic and sporting articles, not included in other classes; protective padding for playing sports; protective pads as part of sportswearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 13, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 25, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 30, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 25, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance