USPTO serial 79132718
ETROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4527549Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2014
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yue (Robert) Xu
Yue (Robert) Xu Apex Attorneys at Law, LLP160 Alamo Plaza #942Alamo, CA 94507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer programs recorded on data media (software) designed for use in construction and automated manufacturing (cad/cam); electronic data processing apparatus; transmitters of electronic signals; flow meters; concentration meters; electric meters; electronic devices, namely, energy meters for tracking and monitoring energy use; flow meters; gas meters; automotive measuring instruments, namely, water temperature gauges, air fuel/ratio gauges, boost gauges, vacuum gauges and exhaust gas temperature gauges; environmental monitoring system comprised of meters and sensors that measure pressure, humidity, temperature and includes alarm and reporting functions; electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; electric control panels; electronic apparatus for the remote control of industrial operations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SICHUAN ETROL TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BEIJING ECHO TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BEIJING ECHO TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ETROL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 26, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 25, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 13, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2013 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |