Drawing for CERAFORCE

USPTO serial 79132748

CERAFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4523937Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2014
Examiner
DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CERAFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine F. Hoffman

Catherine F. Hoffman Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell, & Berkowitz, PC200 East Broward Blvd, Suite 2000FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021[ Pastry brushes; ] [ container for household and kitchen use not of precious metal; ] frying pans; [ bread boards; ] [ non electric pressure cookers; ] lids for pots; [ egg cups, not of precious metal; ice buckets; oil cruets, not of precious metal; chopsticks; bottle openers; ] stew-pans; [ garlic presses in the nature of kitchen utensils; ] [ cookery moulds; ] cooking pot sets; [ cauldrons; ] cooking pots; [ corkscrews; knife rests for the table; hand operated mills for domestic purposes, namely, salt and pepper mills, spice mills; pasta spoons for serving; turners for household use; graters for household purposes; mixing spoons in the nature of kitchen utensils; spatulas in the nature of kitchen utensils; scoops in the nature of tableware; skimming ladles for household use; non electric whisks for household purposes; cutting boards for the kitchen; ] [ non-electric autoclaves in the nature of pressure cookers; ] [ sponges for household purposes; sieves and sifters in the nature of household utensils; pastry cutter; ] pots; [ chopper boards; ] [ woks ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 2, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 2, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 6, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 6, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 8, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 1, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 9, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 9, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 7, 2021EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2021PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Mar 16, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 28, 2020EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2020PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jul 6, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 6, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 18, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 18, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 2013RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 31, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance