Drawing for GRAND CHEF

USPTO serial 79132930

GRAND CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAND CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Knives, namely, chef knives; kitchen knives; butcher knives; paring knives; thin-bladed kitchen knives; scaling knives; fish slicing kitchen knives; Japanese chopping kitchen knives; hand-operated meat choppers, namely, hand tools; hand-operated mincing knives, namely, hand tools; cleavers; vegetable knives; table knives; whetstones sharpening stonesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 16, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2013RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2013SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance