Drawing for APPOTRONICS

USPTO serial 79132980

APPOTRONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTELL, BRITTANY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPOTRONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical lanterns; sound transmitting apparatus; apparatus for transmission of communication; projection screens; epidiascopes; projectors particularly projectors for the entertainment industry; video projectors; light emitting diodes (LEDs); fluorescent screensSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 28, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 31, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2013RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2013RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2013RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 27, 2013RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2013LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2013REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance